Understanding Lessons Learned

 

Most evaluation ToR and reports ask for/include Lessons Learned.

In my experience as a meta-evaluator, most of the review tools organizations use ask whether this element was present in the report and to assess the quality of them. And I must say: I am often confused about what to look for and expect.

Also as an evaluator, I try to add Lessons Learned to my reports but I face similar challenges wondering if they are solid enough.

That is why I had been meaning to deepen my understanding of them and to do this brief cheatsheet – to remind me some key ideas next time I elaborate or review some. Here it is:

 

This is a first approximation. Remaining questions would be how are they different from Good Practices, another commonly asked element in ToR (although I am aware that they are controversial), but most importantly how they are different from plain conclusions.

However, thank you to the colleagues who sent resources and helped me throw some light on it when I asked in EVALTALK (Joaquín de la Concha, Leah G. Moses and M.Q. Patton), and hoping to continue understanding this common evaluation output.

 

You know who would love this... Share!

Latest posts

Wanting more?

Freebie : The Periodic Table 2.0

This Periodic Table of Evaluation (2025) is a collaborative effort between Michael and Sara, created as a gift to the evaluation community. From June 2024 to January 2025, we’ve poured our passion and dedication into this project, holding countless discussions and working through more than 20 versions to get it right.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.